<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Technoreply &#187; Linux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technoreply.com/category/linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technoreply.com</link>
	<description>The Web has never been this fun...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 15:36:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Lightweight Browser? The only solution&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.technoreply.com/lightweight-browser-the-only-solution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technoreply.com/lightweight-browser-the-only-solution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 19:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jevin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technoreply.com/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lightweight browser? What I am thinking of? Why would anyone want a lightweight browser? Well believe it or not, a lot of people would want a lightweight browser.
The reasons vary from having a slow computer to actually wanting something simple that starts up really quick. For my case, it was an incompatibility issue between Firefox [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lightweight browser? What I am thinking of? Why would anyone want a <strong>lightweight browser</strong>? Well believe it or not, a lot of people would want a lightweight browser.</p>
<p>The reasons vary from having a <strong>slow computer</strong> to actually wanting <strong>something simple</strong> that starts up really quick. For my case, it was an incompatibility issue between Firefox and Skype (I should precise that I&#8217;m on Ubuntu 9.04, 64-bit). Whenever I start Firefox, the probability of having a successful Skype call goes from 1 to 0. So, everytime I need to Skype, I have to restart my laptop.</p>
<p>Then came <strong>Links</strong>. I assure you, I knew about Links (<a title="Links lightweight browser" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Links_(web_browser)" target="_blank">Links on Wikipedia</a>) well before. So I decided that Links, being a lightweight browser, would allow me to have Skype calls while browsing. I was not wrong. This lightweight browser works wonders. It does not support Flash, iframes and pretty much anything a Facebook aficionado would find cool, but it does the job for me.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<div id="attachment_56" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://www.technoreply.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/lightweight-browser-links.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-56" title="Lightweight browser, Links, Facebook page" src="http://www.technoreply.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/lightweight-browser-links-150x150.jpg" alt="Facebook page on Links, lightweight browser" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Facebook page on Links, lightweight browser</p></div></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I presume people who can&#8217;t live without beautiful websites would have a hard time with this lightweight browser. Facebook, for instance, simply does not work. Floating CSS elements do not float. Pages are just a long, large column of text. This is pretty much how search engines see your site. And it also brings you back to a time when pages were just text, links and occasional images.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">If you want to get a hold of this lightweight browser, head over to the <a title="Links lightweight browser on Sourceforge" href="http://links.sourceforge.net/" target="_blank">Links Sourceforge page</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technoreply.com/lightweight-browser-the-only-solution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
